Leveling the Playing Field: The Unseen Challenges of Hiring Global Talent for Small Businesses

Small business owners are no strangers to the constant tug-of-war between ambition and constraint. From navigating tight budgets to competing with well-funded industry giants, SMEs (small-to-medium enterprises) have always had to think creatively to survive and thrive. Platforms like Upwork and Freelancer have, in recent years, offered a glimmer of hope by providing access to a global workforce. These platforms empower small businesses to engage skilled freelancers at competitive rates, enabling them to deliver quality work without breaking the bank. But a series of recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) decisions in Australia threatens to undermine this vital lifeline, leaving small businesses scrambling to adapt.

‍

Two recent FWC cases have significant implications for small businesses that hire offshore workers directly. In one notable case, Ms. Joanna Pascua v Doessel Group Pty Ltd, the FWC decided to hear an unfair dismissal claim from a Filipino freelancer working for an Australian company. The Commission’s willingness to exercise jurisdiction—despite the worker being based overseas—sets a potential precedent that could result in Australian businesses being held to the same employment obligations for overseas freelancers as they are for local employees. This includes entitlements like back pay at Australian award rates, penalties, and compliance with unfair dismissal protections.
‍

On the flip side, a contrasting case, Amit Singhal v National Australia Bank Limited, saw the FWC dismiss an unfair dismissal claim brought by an India-based employee. The key distinction? Mr. Singhal was employed through an Indian subsidiary of NAB, shielding the Australian entity from direct liability.

‍

For big businesses like NAB, these decisions reaffirm a playbook they have been using for decades: setting up subsidiaries in offshore markets to tap into global talent pools while staying compliant with local employment laws. However, for SMEs, this level of operational complexity is often out of reach. Incorporating a subsidiary in another country requires significant investment, legal expertise, and administrative overhead—resources most small businesses simply don’t have.
‍

This disparity creates an unequal playing field. Large corporations can continue leveraging cost-effective offshore talent with minimal risk, while small businesses face mounting legal uncertainties when trying to do the same. The very platforms that promised to democratize global hiring for SMEs are now fraught with potential liabilities. What once seemed like a smart, agile solution now feels like a legal minefield.

The irony is that small businesses often turn to global talent not to cut corners, but to survive. When faced with rising local wages, talent shortages, and an ever-growing list of compliance requirements, SMEs need access to cost-effective and flexible solutions. Freelancers and remote workers allow them to remain competitive, innovate, and scale.
‍

These recent legal developments threaten to take that away. Small businesses are left with few options: risk direct engagement with freelancers and potentially face costly claims, or compete against big players who have the infrastructure to mitigate these risks entirely. It’s yet another example of how small businesses are disproportionately burdened by rules and regulations that, while well-intentioned, often overlook their unique challenges.

This is where Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) providers can play a transformative role. By partnering with a BPO, small businesses can effectively sidestep the risks associated with directly hiring overseas talent. BPOs act as the official employer of record, ensuring compliance with local laws while managing payroll, benefits, and other HR functions. This shields SMEs from legal exposure while still granting them access to a global workforce.

‍

Moreover, BPOs offer additional benefits that go beyond risk mitigation. They often provide a structured and scalable approach to workforce management, allowing small businesses to focus on their core operations. Whether it’s virtual assistants, customer support teams, or specialized roles, BPOs make it possible for SMEs to compete on a more level playing field with larger corporations.

The message for small businesses is clear: adapting to this new landscape is not optional. The risks of directly engaging offshore workers are becoming increasingly apparent, and the cost of getting it wrong could be devastating. While the allure of platforms like Upwork remains, they are no longer the straightforward solution they once appeared to be.
‍

Instead, SMEs must consider long-term, sustainable strategies for accessing global talent. Partnering with a reputable BPO not only mitigates risk but also provides the operational support needed to thrive in a competitive marketplace. By embracing this approach, small businesses can continue to harness the benefits of globalization without being derailed by legal complexities.

Small businesses are the backbone of the economy, driving innovation and creating opportunities in their communities. Yet, they continue to face barriers that make it harder to compete with large corporations. The recent FWC decisions highlight a growing challenge: the need for a fair and balanced approach to global hiring that doesn’t leave SMEs at a disadvantage.
‍

In the face of these challenges, small businesses must be proactive. Partnering with a BPO is not just a practical solution; it’s a strategic move that allows SMEs to focus on what they do best—building great products and services—while leaving the complexities of global workforce management to the experts. Only by adapting can small businesses continue to thrive in an increasingly complex world.